Tuesday, June 30, 2015

6 29 2015 CRAF qPCR

Yesterday I decided to check out CRAF which was another gene with good coverage in sequencing and interest results from the initial qPCR check.

Primers:
1636CRAF1_FWDAGCAGGGCATCAAACTCTCCJH5/21/20152055O.luridaTNF receptor-associated factor 3 (EC 6.3.2.-) (CD40 receptor-associated factor 1) (CRAF1) (TRAFAMN)Q60803
1635CRAF1_REVACAAGTCGCACTGGCTACAAJH5/21/20152055O.luridaTNF receptor-associated factor 3 (EC 6.3.2.-) (CD40 receptor-associated factor 1) (CRAF1) (TRAFAMN)Q60803

Reagent Table:
VolumeReactions X58
Ssofast Evagreen MM10580
FWD Primer0.529
REV Primer0.529
Nuclease Free H2O8464
cDNA1
  1. Added reagents from greatest to least volume
  2. Vortexed
  3. Centrifuged briefly
  4. Pipetted 19 ul Master Mix to each tube
  5. Pipetted appropriate cDNA sample to each tube
  6. Centrifuged plate at 2000 rpm for 1 minute
  7. Ran Program Below
Program:
StepTemperatureTime
Initiation95 C10 min
Elongation95 C30 sec
60 C1 min
Read
72 C30 sec
Read
Repeat Elongation 39 times
Termination95 C1 min
55 C1 sec
Melt Curve Manual ramp 0.2C per sec Read 0.5 C55 - 95 C30 sec
21 C10 min
End
Plate Layout:
1234567
DNased 42215 HC1DNased 42215 NC1DNased 42215 SC1DNased 42215 HT1 1DNased 42215 NT1 1DNased 42215 ST1 1NTC
DNased 42215 HC2DNased 42215 NC2DNased 42215 SC2DNased 42215 HT1 2DNased 42215 NT1 2DNased 42215 ST1 2NTC
DNased 42215 HC3DNased 42215 NC3DNased 42215 SC3DNased 42215 HT1 3DNased 42215 NT1 3DNased 42215 ST1 3NTC
DNased 42215 HC4DNased 42215 NC4DNased 42215 SC4DNased 42215 HT1 4DNased 42215 NT1 4DNased 42215 ST1 4NTC
DNased 42215 HC5DNased 42215 NC5DNased 42215 SC5DNased 42215 HT1 5DNased 42215 NT1 5DNased 42215 ST1 5
DNased 42215 HC6DNased 42215 NC6DNased 42215 SC6DNased 42215 HT1 6DNased 42215 NT1 6DNased 42215 ST1 6
DNased 42215 HC7DNased 42215 NC7DNased 42215 SC7DNased 42215 HT1 7DNased 42215 NT1 7DNased 42215 ST1 7
DNased 42215 HC8DNased 42215 NC8DNased 42215 SC8DNased 42215 HT1 8DNased 42215 NT1 8DNased 42215 ST1 8
Results:

All Samples

NTCs


It looks like there was some contamination in the first NTC well but it wasn't present in the other three wells. THe result here are definitely interesting as there appears to be a pretty big difference between samples. More analysis is needed to tease out this info. 

You can see the raw data here

No comments:

Post a Comment