Primers:
1610 | H3.3_FWD | CACGCTCTCCTCGAATCCTC | JH | 5/21/2015 | 20 | 55 | O.lurida | Histone H3.3 | Q6P823 | |
1609 | H3.3_REV | AAGTTGCCTTTCCAGCGTCT | JH | 5/21/2015 | 20 | 55 | O.lurida | Histone H3.3 | Q6P823 |
Reagent Table:
Volume | Reactions X116 | |
Ssofast Evagreen MM | 10 | 1160 |
FWD Primer | 0.5 | 58 |
REV Primer | 0.5 | 58 |
1:9 cDNA | 9 |
- Added reagents from greatest to least volume
- Vortexed
- Centrifuged briefly
- Pipetted 11 ul Master Mix to each tube
- Pipetted 9 ul of 1:9 cDNA each column using a channel pipetter
- Centrifuged plate at 2000 rpm for 1 minute
- Ran Program Below
Program:
Step | Temperature | Time |
Initiation | 95 C | 10 min |
Elongation | 95 C | 30 sec |
60 C | 1 min | |
Read | ||
72 C | 30 sec | |
Read | ||
Repeat Elongation 39 times | ||
Termination | 95 C | 1 min |
55 C | 1 sec | |
Melt Curve Manual ramp 0.2C per sec Read 0.5 C | 55 - 95 C | 30 sec |
21 C | 10 min | |
End |
Plate Layout:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
DNased 42215 HC1 | DNased 42215 NC1 | DNased 42215 SC1 | DNased 42215 HT1 1 | DNased 42215 NT1 1 | DNased 42215 ST1 1 | NTC |
DNased 42215 HC2 | DNased 42215 NC2 | DNased 42215 SC2 | DNased 42215 HT1 2 | DNased 42215 NT1 2 | DNased 42215 ST1 2 | NTC |
DNased 42215 HC3 | DNased 42215 NC3 | DNased 42215 SC3 | DNased 42215 HT1 3 | DNased 42215 NT1 3 | DNased 42215 ST1 3 | NTC |
DNased 42215 HC4 | DNased 42215 NC4 | DNased 42215 SC4 | DNased 42215 HT1 4 | DNased 42215 NT1 4 | DNased 42215 ST1 4 | NTC |
DNased 42215 HC5 | DNased 42215 NC5 | DNased 42215 SC5 | DNased 42215 HT1 5 | DNased 42215 NT1 5 | DNased 42215 ST1 5 | |
DNased 42215 HC6 | DNased 42215 NC6 | DNased 42215 SC6 | DNased 42215 HT1 6 | DNased 42215 NT1 6 | DNased 42215 ST1 6 | |
DNased 42215 HC7 | DNased 42215 NC7 | DNased 42215 SC7 | DNased 42215 HT1 7 | DNased 42215 NT1 7 | DNased 42215 ST1 7 | |
DNased 42215 HC8 | DNased 42215 NC8 | DNased 42215 SC8 | DNased 42215 HT1 8 | DNased 42215 NT1 8 | DNased 42215 ST1 8 |
Results:
All samples
NTCs
The amplification curves look great in this one. There is no amplification in the NTCs. Now I just need to compare the Ct values to confirm its good.
The replicates look ok but not great. I generated a graph of the replicate difference.
The difference between reps get above 3 Ct different. I will average these Ct's together to help alleviate these issues.
You can see the raw data here.
Jake, nice job!
ReplyDelete